Inconstitucionalidad del juicio o procedimiento coactivo.

Abstract

Faced with the different cases of the facto violations that have occurred by state institutions in exercising the so-called “coercive jurisdiction” for some, and for others “administrative procedure”; the facto violations that end up falling so much on the economic patrimony of the Ecuadorian citizens as affecting the psychological state of the debtor: This work is presented with historical support, legal norms of different level that the public institutions of the Ecuadorian state apply in the day to day of its existence to recover the collection of different obligations that they consider to be overdue, without realizing that in doing so they violate rights that the state itself has established for its citizens that fundamentally determine the equality of state against different processes or judgments of collection that exist in Ecuador; and not only that, but it benefits certain institutions that without any reason privileges them with this trial with advantages of others of the same type. However, the objective of determining the unconstitutionality at the conclusion will not leave the state institutions that have this collection mechanism legally helpless, as we will provide a quick and efficient alternative to the collection of their debts.