Fideicomiso como garantía adecuada para créditos automotrices.

Abstract

This work entails demonstrating that the elimination of the constitution of commercial automobile trust has neither a legal basis nor legislative motivation for what reason it was prohibited. The process of execution of these assets does not violate a type of right and brought advantages for both the debtor, creditor and the same judicial system because we avoid charges of judicial proceedings that could be resolved administratively by the trust itself due to which is an institution enjoys autonomy. In the same way I will show that the statement that prohibits the constitution of trusts with vehicle guarantees contradicts the law of the stock market, where the constitution of this figure with both movable or immovable property is allowed. I will make known my conclusions and recommendations whose main objective is that vehicles that are movable property can be re-immersed within the figure of commercial trust, in order to repeal the absurd subsection that prevails in article 53 of the organic law for the strengthening and optimization of the corporate and stock market sector.