Comparación de la supervivencia de coronas completas vs onlay. Revisión de literatura.

Abstract

Introduction: Caries is the main reason for the loss of dental structure, there are other non-carious lesions, such as erosion, abfraction, attrition and fracture, which cause the degradation of the hard tissues of the teeth, which will require a restoration. Objective: To evaluate the survival rate of full crowns compared to onlay inlays. Materials and Methods: Scientific review of qualitative, retrospective, prospective approach, meta-analysis, clinical trials, in vitro and case reports, obtained from meta search engines through the web such as: pubmed, science direct and Google academic. Selecting 20 articles, for analysis and data collection. Results: types of restorative materials, composite resin onlay 97.4% and 96.40% crown in 5 years, feldspathic porcelain 92% onlay and 97% crown in 10 years, glass ceramics reinforced with leucite or lithium disilicate 96.7% onlay. and 96.60% crown in 5 years, Gold 90.50% onlay and 95.40% crown in 5 years, glass-ceramic 95% onlay and 84.70% crown in 15 years, glass ceramics 96% onlay and 94.7% crown in 5 years. years and it occurred more in the posterior area, biological and technical complications were presented. Conclusion: The 5-year survival rate for crowns and onlays is very high, exceeding 90%.