Problemas de prueba de la verosimilitud en el delito de intimidación.

Abstract

Intimidation has as requirements to be imputed, that the threat constitutes a crime and it has to be plausible, the crime of intimidation in Ecuador has had a fairly limited historical development over the last few years, but in comparison with the same crime regulated in other countries, the one typified in this country enjoys more individuality, separating it by its requirements from the crime of extortion, this research work focuses on determining what are the parameters that a judge can or should take into consideration to declare that a threat or intimidation is plausible, analyzing the social background of each individual, from their economic position to the groups of people with whom they relate, always bearing in mind that these factors must be linked to the threat that is uttered and should not be isolated antecedents that seek to discriminate against any subject, they will finally be identified and they will detail the problems that this criminal type entails within the code and practice to suggest a reform that contributes to the moment of imposing a sentence in a crime that has fallen into disuse.