La inimpugnabilidad de los autos interlocutorios que no dan fin al proceso contencioso administrativo.

Abstract

The Ecuadorian legal system contains several methods to challenge resolutions issued by different authorities, whether judicial or administrative. These defense mechanisms are called appeals and seek to ensure that the rights of citizens are respected by presenting them a way whose purpose is to leave without effect a resolution or sentence that generates a prejudice, being filed before the same administrative authority or before a court in a judicial venue, depending on the case. In this paper we will focus on the interlocutory orders that do not terminate the process, which generally can be appealed with deferred effect; however, since the administrative contentious proceeding already begins with the drawing of a court, it is interesting that the regulations do not provide an alternative for these to be declared without effect, making them unappealable. The objective is to analyze the nature of the appeals and verify whether or not an appeal against an interlocutory order that does not put an end to this process is indeed possible; likewise, it will be determined whether or not it is necessary to establish possible alternatives or solutions that allow appealing the decision of these orders, as well as whether such ruling should be final and not subject to appeal.