Límites y alcance del recurso de revocatoria en contra de un auto interlocutorio COGEP.

Abstract

The investigation focuses on analyzing the substantial insufficiencies in Ecuadorian procedural legislation, specifically in relation to resources to challenge interlocutory orders in civil proceedings. Evincing the need in the exercise of the profession of Lawyer to constitute the appeal for revocation as an effective and applicable means of challenge in interlocutory orders in order not to violate or affect effective judicial protection, the principle of speed and procedural economy. With this, it is sought through the analysis of doctrine, jurisprudence, comparative law, and sentences to examine the admissibility of this appeal for revocation in interlocutory orders, investigating its impact on procedural legislation. During this investigation, the reform of an article of the COGEP will be proposed, which allows the procedural parties to formulate in a hearing or in writing the revocation of an interlocutory order, that is, for the ruling to be analyzed by the same jurisdictional body that pronounced it and void and dictate another replacement.