La falta de motivación en la difusión de resultados de las evaluaciones en los concursos de mérito y oposición.

Abstract

Merit-based and competitive selection processes are mechanisms used to choose the best candidates for specific roles within public service. These processes are organized by various public entities, requiring applicants to go through multiple stages, ensuring credibility, transparency, and equal opportunities for all participants.However, during the stage of disseminating or publishing the results of the evaluations taken by the applicants, a potential lack of motivation from the organizers becomes evident, as they fail to provide detailed results or disclose information about the technical or expert personnel responsible for grading these evaluations. This lack of transparency affects constitutional principles such as access to information and accountability.Moreover, it opens the door to potential irregularities or undue advantages for certain applicants, thereby also undermining the constitutional principle of equality. As evidenced in this research, this issue calls for a review of practices in other countries and, if necessary, their adoption to benefit applicants and ensure due process in meritbased and competitive selection processes, ultimately fostering confidence in these procedures among applicants and the general public.