Análisis jurídico de la procedencia, interposición y admisibilidad de los recursos verticales presentados en contra de providencias emitidas en la ejecución de sentencias dictadas en procesos de conocimiento.

Abstract

In the General Organic Code of Processes there are antinomies between the legal dispositions that regulate the procedence, interposition and admissibility of appeals filed against Court injunctions in the judicial execution phase of decisions issued on declaratory judgment actions. The present thesis has two purposes: first, to determine against which court orders in the judicial execution phase of decisions issued on declaratory judgment actions can be appealed; and, second, to propose legal reforms to the General Organic Code of Process, to suppress the antinomies currently found in these especific regulations. In order to achieve the aforementioned purposes, it was necessary to study the appeals that the General Organic Code of Processes foresees; the fundamental aspects of judicial execution, as well as the provisions that regulate the appeals in it; and, judicial decisions in which there are criteria regarding the procedence, interposition and admissibility of appeals raisde in the judicial execution.