La crisis de los sistemas judiciales y su optimización en los MARC.

Abstract

Within the last year of filing files through judicial channels, it was determined that 96% of Within the last year of filing files through judicial channels, it was determined that 96% of these were resolved, 95% remain pending, however, it was determined that there is a percentage greater than 100% of procedural burden, considering that the judicial systems are presenting a crisis that has been determined as a persistent challenge affecting the efficiency and promptness in the administration of justice. In this way, the implementation of the MARC is proposed, being these more feasible, adapting in a flexible, simple and effective way. It is said that it maintains characteristics of a silent social movement, since its purpose is to make changes within the judicial processes, considering itself silent due to the impossibility of regulating this figure, it will be due to the fact that legal workers do not accept it correctly, positioning themselves with social operators before The imposition of the new figure generating a conflict between political, economic, social and legal relations, however, for the parties this new method is beneficial in terms of time and money, having new alternative mechanisms such as negotiation, conciliation, mediation and arbitration. MARCs are a promising way to address these deficiencies and significantly improve the effectiveness of the Ecuadorian judicial system.