La prueba rigurosa en la audiencia de juicio.

Abstract

The problem that is addressed in this study is that it is necessary to specify in a more concise and descriptive way the foundations and cases in which the practice of what has been agreed in evidentiary agreements must be respected, which is known as rigorous evidence, which it is part of the general rule in terms of presentation and assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings. However, better established precisions known and applied under exceptional terms or circumstances are also required for new testing. Therefore, a normative reform is required within the COIP that knows how to establish the appropriate rules for the application of any of these two cases according to what best corresponds to the process. It is for this reason that the objective of this research points to the incorporation of the rules of sound criticism, since this proposal is supported by the evidentiary standards in criminal matters. Regarding the methodology of this research, a study has been carried out based on the qualitative modality, where the doctrine references, the national legal norms and comparative law and the case studies allow us to know and discern how the test can be applied in certain contexts. rigorous and in others the new test according to sound criticism in criminal proceedings. Therefore, the results of this research based on the interviews and validation of the proposal determine that it is feasible to apply within the text of the COIP.