DSpace logo
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/handle/3317/9346
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorMoreno Córdova, Guido Niman-
dc.contributor.authorGavilanes Ibarra, Ángel Camilo-
dc.contributor.authorQuezada Rivera, Carlos Emmanuel-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-11T18:17:42Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-11T18:17:42Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/handle/3317/9346-
dc.descriptionSe denomina, colecistitis aguda calculosa a la inflamación que ocurre en la vesícula biliar ocasionado por el obstáculo a su salida de la bilis, que suele ser de manejo clínico – quirúrgico. (1,2). Se presenta un estudio observacional, transversal y retrospectivo, en donde se seleccionó las colecistectomias que tuvieron un método de abordaje por medio de laparotomía como laparoscopía, con un total de 161 pacientes, en donde 95 (61.5%) se le aplico técnica laparoscópica, 62 (38,5%) por medio de colecistectomía abierta, y un pequeño grupo (2,4%) se convirtió a técnica abierta.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe acute calculus cholecystitis is inflammation of the gallbladder, located behind the liver, which is produced by an obstacle in the bacine or biliary tract, thus producing an accumulation of bile and subsequent increase of intraluminal pressure, Producing an inflammatory and obstructive picture of acute cholecystitis (1); Whose surgic al approach has two access routes, the first conventional procedure performed by Langerbuch and the laparoscopic procedure described in 1987 by Philippe Mouret, whose choice will depend on different factors. . An observational and retrospective study was carried out, where appendectomies were performed, using a laparoscopy approach, with a total of 161 patients, where 62 (38.5%) were submitted to a conventional technique and 99 ( 61.5%) by laparoscopic technique and a small group of 4 (2.5%) surgery was performed; The hospital stay and complications were compared according to the type of approach used. It was concluded that there is a greater presentation of complications and a higher incidence of infection of the approach site, by the open technique, which is why it is recommended to use laparoscopy to approach this pathology.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquilen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectCOLECISTITIS AGUDAen_US
dc.subjectCOLECISTECTOMÍA LAPAROCÓPICAen_US
dc.subjectLAPAROTOMÍAen_US
dc.subjectESTANCIA HOSPITALARIAen_US
dc.titleEstudio comparativo de colecistectomía abierta vs colecistectomía laparoscópica en pacientes que han sido operados en emergencia del Hospital Teodoro Maldonado Carbo en el periodo octubre del 2016 a enero del 2017.en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US
Aparece en las colecciones: Trabajos de Titulación - Carrera de Medicina

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
T-UCSG-PRE-MED-617.pdf1,1 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons